[ietf-dkim] Re: dkim service

[Michael Thomas]

Dave Crocker wrote:
> a derivative bit that emerged from this was the counter-intuitive 
> possibility that a mailing list capable of doing dkim signing could 
> choose not to, for a message that is already signed.  that is, it could 
> knowingly preserve the existing signature.

Counterintuitive? Hmm. Wasn't it Ernie Kovaks' schtick:
"''doctor it hurts when I do this'' ''so don't do that''"

		Mike