[ietf-dkim] Re: dkim service
mike at mtcc.com
Thu Oct 13 12:24:22 PDT 2005
Dave Crocker wrote:
> a derivative bit that emerged from this was the counter-intuitive
> possibility that a mailing list capable of doing dkim signing could
> choose not to, for a message that is already signed. that is, it could
> knowingly preserve the existing signature.
Counterintuitive? Hmm. Wasn't it Ernie Kovaks' schtick:
"''doctor it hurts when I do this'' ''so don't do that''"
More information about the ietf-dkim