[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis
dot at dotat.at
Tue Aug 23 11:49:27 PDT 2005
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Keith Moore wrote:
> I don't think DKIM should preclude MUA signing of authored content.
> > However the submission server cannot trivially include the list of
> > recipients in the message signature and remain compatible with BCC (which
> > is one of our requirements).
> Sure it can. Any recipient in the envelope but not in the message header gets
> a separate signature. Easiest thing to do is to sign outgoing traffic rather
> than incoming traffic.
This doesn't help for BCC recipients at the same domain.
f.a.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
More information about the ietf-dkim