[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis

[Ned Freed]

> John R Levine wrote:
> >>>Right.  The context is who signed it.
> >>
> >>That's not sufficient unless signers who (re)transmit messages are
> >>clearly distinguishable from signers who author content.
> >
> >
> > You keep saying that, I keep pointing out that you're wrong.  I guess
> > we're done.

> no, you keep claiming that I'm wrong, while misrepresenting what I'm
> proposing.  I don't think you're convincing anyone.

Keith, I don't mean to be rude, but I think you have this backwards. I think
you have been wrong from the outset and nothing you have said has convinced me
otherwise.

				Ned