[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis
ned.freed at mrochek.com
Tue Aug 23 10:41:51 PDT 2005
> John R Levine wrote:
> >>>Right. The context is who signed it.
> >>That's not sufficient unless signers who (re)transmit messages are
> >>clearly distinguishable from signers who author content.
> > You keep saying that, I keep pointing out that you're wrong. I guess
> > we're done.
> no, you keep claiming that I'm wrong, while misrepresenting what I'm
> proposing. I don't think you're convincing anyone.
Keith, I don't mean to be rude, but I think you have this backwards. I think
you have been wrong from the outset and nothing you have said has convinced me
More information about the ietf-dkim