[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis

[John R Levine]

> > Right.  The context is who signed it.
>
> That's not sufficient unless signers who (re)transmit messages are
> clearly distinguishable from signers who author content.

You keep saying that, I keep pointing out that you're wrong.  I guess
we're done.

R's,
John

PS:

> That's a bit like saying that drivers in some states are better than
> drivers in other states, so states should discourage bad drivers by
> blocking off their borders with states with bad driving reputations.

Right.  It works really well for e-mail, because domains are not states
and mail messages are not drivers.  But as a former resident of
Massachusetts, with some of the worst drivers in the country, I have to
say it wouldn't be all that bad an idea for drivers, either.