[ietf-dkim] DKIM SSP: Security vulnerability when SSP record does not exist?

[Scott Kitterman]

Douglas Otis wrote:

> DKIM should verify a domain that can be held accountable for stopping
> abusive messages.  (It would be nice for the recipient to see who is
> accountable.)  However, displaying the accountable domain is not needed
> and should not be attempted with feeble header bindings.  With DKIM,
> administrators can ensure bad actors are excluded.  With DKIM, creating
> a list of trusted domains will exclude most of the emails which need
> greater examination.
> 
So, given that view, as a sender, what's in it for me?

Sounds like all I get is more spam reports and maybe on a domain based 
blacklist if someone doesn't like my mail?  What benifit is being 
offered that I should risk that?

Scott Kitterman