[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis

[Michael Thomas]

Keith Moore wrote:
>>>> Well, DKIM doesn't make it through this list unless you use l=
>>>> and z=. :)
>>
>>
>> We definitely had this argument before.
> 
> 
> what's this "we" stuff, white man?  we don't even have a WG yet and  
> you're trying to insist that this is already a settled issue?

It's "settled" insofar as the people who hate it don't have
to do it, and the people who like it can reconstruct messages
through "ordinary" mailing lists, and delete off any added
cruft if they're worried about it. My implementation right
now doesn't break through this list, others do.

		Mike