[ietf-dkim] Re: on DKIM as an anti-spam measure

[Frank Ellermann]

Keith Moore wrote:

> "I will accept any content that claims to be
>  sexually-explicit, the other filters notwithstanding" :)

A quick and dirty threat analysis:  "Publishing 'receiver
policies' might not work as expected".

> OTOH, If we don't want the direct marketing folks to fight
> this tooth and nail, we need to give them ways to convince
> recipients to not filter their mail.  So let them make
> assertions about their messages that induce us to read them.
> They'll get better transparency (more predictability) out of
> the mail system and better ability to fine-target their
> audience.  We'll get better spam filtering.  Everybody wins.

Makes sense, getting the opposition to adopt the new rules
is more important than convincing the rest of the world.

                       Bye, Frank