[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis

Arvel Hathcock arvel at altn.com
Mon Aug 15 13:49:39 PDT 2005


> DKIM either needs stronger binding semantics, or
> it needs to limit when signing can be done.

I think DKIM deals with this correctly right now.  Binding to the 
RFC2822.From header is not required BUT when it's missing an SSP check is 
performed to discover and enforce the wishes of the domain owner.

--
Arvel





More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list