[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis
sm at resistor.net
Mon Aug 15 11:47:18 PDT 2005
At 10:15 15-08-2005, John Levine wrote:
>It might be better to say
> ... by identifying a domain that takes responsibility for the message.
>We don't promise that's the only domain that might have something to
>do with it, we do promise that's the place to complain to if you
>don't like it.
Yes, that was what I was trying to say. Douglas provided a better definition.
> The main benefit of DKIM is that a validating agent can know who is
> taking responsibility for the message.
More information about the ietf-dkim