[ietf-dkim] Not exactly not a threat analysis

[SM]

At 10:15 15-08-2005, John Levine wrote:
>It might be better to say
>
>   ... by identifying a domain that takes responsibility for the message.
>
>We don't promise that's the only domain that might have something to
>do with it, we do promise that's the place to complain to if you
>don't like it.

Yes, that was what I was trying to say.  Douglas provided a better definition.

>   The main benefit of DKIM is that a validating agent can know who is
>   taking responsibility for the message.

That's clearer.

Regards,
-sm