Design approach to MASS (was Re: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying)

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Aug 11 11:04:06 PDT 2005


On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:42:32 -0500, Earl Hood wrote:
>  Failure to respond just gives the impression that lip service is being given.


Process point:

IETF rough consensus is predicated on developing support for a view. Hence, 
developing that support is a fundamental hurdle that is a natural and 
constructive part of the IETF process.

Participants in an IETF process are not obligated to respond to anyone's 
postings.

So, failure to respond to someone's view is nothing more than an indication of 
lack of support for that view and, therefore, its failure to pass this basic 
hurdle.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net





More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list