Design approach to MASS (was Re: [ietf-dkim] On per-user-keying)
Dave Crocker
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Aug 11 11:04:06 PDT 2005
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 11:42:32 -0500, Earl Hood wrote:
> Failure to respond just gives the impression that lip service is being given.
Process point:
IETF rough consensus is predicated on developing support for a view. Hence,
developing that support is a fundamental hurdle that is a natural and
constructive part of the IETF process.
Participants in an IETF process are not obligated to respond to anyone's
postings.
So, failure to respond to someone's view is nothing more than an indication of
lack of support for that view and, therefore, its failure to pass this basic
hurdle.
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list