[clear] Re: [ietf-dkim] What's a replay?

[Tony Finch]

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, John Leslie wrote:
> Tony Finch <dot at dotat.at> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Eric Allman wrote:
> >>
> >> Interesting proposal, but I wonder if it's realistic.  It seems to presume
> >> that folks have implemented CSA in the first place.  I find I can't really
> >> evaluate that proposal well, because I frankly find it hard to read.
> >
> > [ mid-conversation change of mailing list ]
>
>    It's hard to guess the context here...

See the References: and In-Reply-To: header fields for links to the
context. In any case, it isn't relevant to the poor readability of the CSA
specification.

> > I agree, but I haven't succeeded with my suggested improvements to the spec.
>
>    Perhaps you'd like to outline these improvements?

I did so over a year ago, and changes to the spec since then mean that the
suggestion is no longer useful. See my messages from 16 Jun 2004 Subject:
Re: CSV specification revision available. My suggestions were apparently
"totally unacceptable" so I lost enthusiasm for working on wording
improvements.

Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0406162005030.25488 at orange.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0406162132060.9579 at yellow.csi.cam.ac.uk>

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot at dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR
GOOD.