[dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS

[Tony Hansen]

The Security Considerations will still need to explain why they are 
light enough that we aren't going straight to sha 256.

     Tony Hansen
     tony at att.com

On 9/24/2010 2:53 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> But perhaps the easiest way to solve this debate was pointed out by Barry: The IESG would be unlikely to support a protocol with even light security implications that uses MD5 without a lot of research into why it's the best choice over other algorithms.  So that's that. :)
>