[dkim-ops] more on signature failure -- TXT record issues?
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at sendmail.com
Mon Nov 3 10:08:32 PST 2008
John R Levine wrote:
> It appears that few DKIM records that would be more than 255 characters.
> Have people checked that their verifiers do indeed handle multiple TXT
> strings correctly? It's not something that would often come up unless you
> deliberately made the strings shorter than normal.
...or very large keys, say 2048 bits or more.
Ours reassembles correctly. The RFC gives guidance about doing this,
though I would argue it should be a little more blatant since I missed
it the first couple of times I read it.
More information about the dkim-ops