[dkim-ops] more on signature failure -- TXT record issues?

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at sendmail.com
Mon Nov 3 10:08:32 PST 2008


John R Levine wrote:
> It appears that few DKIM records that would be more than 255 characters. 
> Have people checked that their verifiers do indeed handle multiple TXT 
> strings correctly?  It's not something that would often come up unless you 
> deliberately made the strings shorter than normal.
>   
...or very large keys, say 2048 bits or more.

Ours reassembles correctly.  The RFC gives guidance about doing this, 
though I would argue it should be a little more blatant since I missed 
it the first couple of times I read it.


More information about the dkim-ops mailing list