[dkim-ops] Test Results for various reflectors

[Dan Mahoney, System Admin]

On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, SM wrote:

> Hi Dan,
> At 14:34 08-06-2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>> Okay.  My results for every reflector listed on testing.dkim.org (with 
>> every possible signing mode) are here (and they're DISMAL):
>
> Thanks for the notes on the autoresponders.
>
> Your DKIM signature fails verification.
>
>> In any case, no detail is mentioned about how these differ, unless I feel 
>> like reading the drafts (and no links are provided, even so it would be a 
>> TEDIOUS read).
>
> You can find the drafts of the implementation in the dk/dkim milter tarballs. 
> The latest version of dkim-milter uses ietf-base-01 by default.

I'm guessing there's no space within the spec for a signature to include 
which spec it was signed to be in compliance with -- and to ignore 
otherwise, or use the all-important feedback address?

>> * Can anyone post contact addresses for issues with these reflectors? 
>> Ideally we need more info, such as: what testing method they're using, 
>> contact address, what standards they support.
>
> You can post dkim-milter questions to the dkim-milter mailing list.  I'm 
> copying this email to you as the one you receive from this list will fail 
> verification.

Well, I was more looking for contacts at each individual site running a 
reflector.  Leaving a decaying piece of software out in the open is not a 
good thing.

Then again, there's always this:

Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130])
     by sendmail.net (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k589koGh078815
     for <sa-test at sendmail.net>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 02:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
     (envelope-from danm at prime.gushi.org)

That sendmail.net is not running the latest version of their own code (a 
fairly critical update -- and is ignoring the standard of rebuilding their 
sendmail.cf with an upgrade to sendmail...these things also trouble me.

MTA
MTA Version
DKIM Verifier (milter/spamassassin plugin/etc?)
DKIM Identifier Version
DKIM Outbound signature version (which the reply email will be presumably 
signed with).
Contact Email Address

>
> Regards,
> -sm

--

<Gushi> And hello kitty does not have a mouth.
<bizzy> . o O ( oh yes she does )

EfNet #macintosh, 2/21/01, some ridiculous hour of the morning

--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie,  Sysadmin,  WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
ICQ: 13735144   AIM: LarpGM
Site:  http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------