[dkim-ops] Test Results for various reflectors

[SM]

Hi Dan,
At 14:34 08-06-2006, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
>Okay.  My results for every reflector listed on testing.dkim.org 
>(with every possible signing mode) are here (and they're DISMAL):

Thanks for the notes on the autoresponders.

Your DKIM signature fails verification.

>In any case, no detail is mentioned about how these differ, unless I 
>feel like reading the drafts (and no links are provided, even so it 
>would be a TEDIOUS read).

You can find the drafts of the implementation in the dk/dkim milter 
tarballs.  The latest version of dkim-milter uses ietf-base-01 by default.

>* Can anyone post contact addresses for issues with these 
>reflectors? Ideally we need more info, such as: what testing method 
>they're using, contact address, what standards they support.

You can post dkim-milter questions to the dkim-milter mailing 
list.  I'm copying this email to you as the one you receive from this 
list will fail verification.

Regards,
-sm