[dkim-dev] DKIM Reflectors produce wrong results (part II)

[Jason Long]

>>>> Steffen Lehmann <lehmann at strato-rz.de> 4/14/08 10:58 AM >>>
>I think the reflectors have difficulties with the body line
>    "
>
>      =B7          =B7         =B7          =B7=20
>
>"
>
>which is canonicalized to
>
>'20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7=20'0D''0A'
>
>The body canon algo is "relaxed", 

I don't think so. The signature itself does not specify a body canon, and
according to RFC 4871, section 3.5, c=:

       If
       only one algorithm is named, that algorithm is used for the
       header and "simple" is used for the body.  For example,
       "c=relaxed" is treated the same as "c=relaxed/simple".


Jason