[dkim-dev] g=;

[Michael Thomas]

Juan Altmayer Pizzorno wrote:
> Folks,
>
> "g=;" in the key, according to DKIM draft, "never matches any addresses".
> Does anybody know what is the rationale for creating a key that never matches
> any addresses?  It seems to me it would have made more sense for it to match
> the empty local part, which happens in i='s default.  What am I missing?
>
>   
In the deep recesses of my memory this was a way of invalidating
a key. Or more precisely, another way. (p=; being another :)


       Mike