[dkim-dev] Choosing sets of headers to sign

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Jan 12 14:32:06 PST 2007



Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Dave Crocker wrote:
>> 1. How are folks deciding what fields to sign?
> 
> Our current implementation signs all headers by default, but you can 
> select your own list as an override.  However, it will always include 
> From, Date, Subject, Sender, Resent-From, Resent-Sender, and all 
> Content-* headers regardless of the list you give it.  I came up with 
> that set on my own.
> 
> I'd have to think about it for a while to recall why that particular 
> list was chosen.

It will probably be worth documenting that, for these discussion.  My immediate 
reaction to the set is:  1) Originator address info, 2) timestampt, and 3) root 
body structure lables.

What I'm curious about is why Message-ID and Subject were not included.


d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net


More information about the dkim-dev mailing list