[dkim-dev] Do you have an interoperable DKIM of the recent spec?

Arvel Hathcock arvel.hathcock at altn.com
Sat Dec 16 20:18:00 PST 2006


We have developed and deployed DKIM signing and verifying in MDaemon. 
All Mdaemon's verify and sign with both allman-01 and ieft-06 (or 
whichever one went to last-call).

A recent inter-op set of test emails (as in just now tonight LOL) 
results in this:

sa-test at sendmail.net: two-way interoperating without any known problems.
dktest at blackops.org: two-way interoperating without any known problems.
dkim-test at dkim.org: this address return perm failures - "relay denied"
autorespond+dkim at elandsys.org: our signatures fail to verify and their 
signature can not be evaluated because of DNS misconfiguration.  I don't 
think elandsys has ever worked for us (although I can't remember for sure).

Cisco's reflector is not listed at 
http://testing.dkim.org/reflector.html and I've lost track of that 
address however the last tests interoperated without any problems (was 
some months ago though).

I don't know of any other reflectors out there.  I would love to see 
reflectors representing all of the products listed here:
http://www.dkim.org/deploy/index.htm

-- 
Arvel Hathcock
CEO, Alt-N Technologies
http://www.altn.com


Dave Crocker wrote:
> I'm trying to find out how many implementations of DKIM there are, based 
> on any of the recent versions of the spec.  Doesn't have to be as late 
> as the one issued out of the working group, but something close.
> 
> I don't care about the status of the code (prototype, alpha, beta, 
> released, hack, whatever), product plans, release schedules or anything 
> else.
> 
> All I want to find out is that you have some code that has interoperated 
> with someone else's code.  I guess "interoperating" with a test suite 
> will qualify, for my purposes.
> 
> The purpose of this exercise is very simple:  For anyone who claims that 
> the current spec can't be implemented, I want to feed back to them a 
> number that says how many already have been done.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> d/



More information about the dkim-dev mailing list