[batv-tech] Hello & What shall we discuss
dhc at dcrocker.net
Wed May 9 09:41:31 PDT 2007
Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Same here. However, in my implementation I try not to mess with RFC2822
> message headers as a rule so the TO: header may contain the BATV encoded
> form in these cases.
In fact, I've been quietly assuming that that is an "advanced" use of the BATV
technique: likely to have some usefulness, but distracting for the document
to focus on now...
More information about the batv-tech