[batv-tech] Hello & What shall we discuss

[Dave Crocker]

Arvel Hathcock wrote:
> Same here.  However, in my implementation I try not to mess with RFC2822 
> message headers as a rule so the TO: header may contain the BATV encoded 
> form in these cases.

In fact, I've been quietly assuming that that is an "advanced" use of the BATV 
technique:  likely to have some usefulness, but distracting for the document 
to focus on now...

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net