[feedback-report] Let's get started

[John R. Levine]

>> Hmmn.  Would that be a conversation in which someone pointed out that the 
>> IESG would never accept an overgrown ARF that tried to reinvent INCH so it 
>> would be a waste of time to do?
>> 
> It is not clear to me that IESG has any preferences one way or another.

I was under the impression that INCH was a political football, so 
something that looks like quasi-INCH could be an issue.

Also, from a purely technical point of view, ARF is multitype/report which 
means that it always has one (1) email message attached.  Trying to use it 
for something other than mail reports really would be driving nails with a 
screwdriver.

Given how complex INCH is, it might well be worthwhile to make subset
profiles and tools to help people use it but that's not part of an ARF 
effort.

R's,
John