[feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for participation -- Please comment
therr at security.rr.com
Wed Sep 23 12:55:23 PDT 2009
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:yakov at shaftek.org]
> > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 7:11 PM
> > To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> > Cc: abuse-feedback-report at mipassoc.org
> > Subject: Re: [feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for
> > participation -- Please comment
> > I would like to participate but I have an issue with the deliverables.
> > Specifically, I am concerned with the possibility that we may get
> > stuck on discussing all the proposed extensions before codifying the
> > main draft. I would like to suggest that we make standardizing the
> > bare minimum of ARF first, and consider the extensions as a second
> > step. If a larger scope format evolves from it, it may become ARF 2.0,
> > but we need the 1.0 in place first.
> I believe this jives with what a few others have said. I'm fine with this approach if there's consensus.
> So if I were to rework the deliverables, effectively swapping (1) and (2) from the current draft charter, it sounds like that would make everyone happy. Specifically, we would push to get ARF finalized as minimally as possible (maybe even removing some stuff) and then work on the suggested list of things, including the DKIM stuff, as extensions.
> Do I hear any "+1"s?
> abuse-feedback-report mailing list
> abuse-feedback-report at mipassoc.org
Principal Engineer and Postmaster V: 703.345.2447
Road Runner Email Operations M: 571.287.0366
therr at security.rr.com AIM: RRMailToddHerr
More information about the abuse-feedback-report