[feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for participation -- Please comment
steve at word-to-the-wise.com
Wed Sep 23 12:22:54 PDT 2009
On Sep 23, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> I would like to participate but I have an issue with the
>> Specifically, I am concerned with the possibility that we may get
>> stuck on discussing all the proposed extensions before codifying the
>> main draft. I would like to suggest that we make standardizing the
>> bare minimum of ARF first, and consider the extensions as a second
>> step. If a larger scope format evolves from it, it may become ARF
>> but we need the 1.0 in place first.
> I believe this jives with what a few others have said. I'm fine
> with this approach if there's consensus.
> So if I were to rework the deliverables, effectively swapping (1)
> and (2) from the current draft charter, it sounds like that would
> make everyone happy. Specifically, we would push to get ARF
> finalized as minimally as possible (maybe even removing some stuff)
> and then work on the suggested list of things, including the DKIM
> stuff, as extensions.
> Do I hear any "+1"s?
Yup, sounds like a good plan to me.
More information about the abuse-feedback-report