[feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for participation -- Please comment
vesely at tana.it
Tue Sep 22 23:43:08 PDT 2009
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Attached is a revised proposed charter for an IETF working group
> regarding the ARF work.
Thanks for that addition!
It's good to mention INCH, not only because non-message extensions
can be addressed that way, but also for complementarity that may
manifest, e.g., when a botnet message reported using ARF happens to
contribute useful info to a network incident maintained using IODEF.
> [...] So after reviewing the draft charter, please reply to the
> list with some comments along the lines of the following as you feel
I would participate in a working group with this charter.
Formally, I represent just myself. However, I try to consider the
needs of several small to medium mailbox providers that serve one or
few mail domains within non-IT companies or institutions. That is to
say, organizations that currently use neither ARF nor IODEF, but
might adopt any of them when a clear proposal of cooperation for a
better Internet will be made.
More information about the abuse-feedback-report