[feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for participation -- Please comment
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Mon Sep 21 10:48:42 PDT 2009
> -----Original Message-----
> From: abuse-feedback-report-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:abuse-
> feedback-report-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 10:44 AM
> To: ARF mailing list
> Subject: Re: [feedback-report] Revised draft charter, call for
> participation -- Please comment
> I'd like to participate if there were fewer deliverables.
> ARF is, at core, a way of encapsulating a clean copy of a single email
> along with some metadata.
> The extensions you mention as possibilities cannot be added without
> changing ARF entirely, as they are not things that can be expressed as
> a copy of a single email.
The charter doesn't require adoption of any or all of those proposed extensions. It just makes a commitment to their due consideration.
A spinoff effort to consider the non-messaging extensions that have been proposed also seems quite palatable to me, even if it would be as simple as "here's how to use/extend INCH to do that", since clearly there's a need for it.
More information about the abuse-feedback-report