[feedback-report] New ARF internet draft

[John Levine]

>We should bump the version number in 5.1 at some point.
>I'm thinking to 1.0.
>
>In 5.3 we were assuming that Reported-URI: would include the
>mailto: case. Dunno if that's worth mentioning explicitly.

I'll collect the suggestions for one more pass.

At next week's MAAWG meeting I hope we can get together with some of
the people who are sending large numbers of ARFs.  If they like it,
I think we're done, and we can push it along toward an Informational
RFC.

R's,
John