[feedback-report] How's that revised ARF draft coming along?

[Yakov Shafranovich]

Any idea on what is left to do for it, aside for editing, etc? Where
there any features that need to be added?

Yakov

John R Levine wrote:
> Wasn't someone going to tidy up the 2005 ARF draft and resubmit it, so
> it's alive again and we can possible send it along to be an independent
> RFC?   If nobody else is working on it, I'd be happy to pick it up.
> 
> I have a fair amount of interest from mail certifiers in getting reports
> saying "you said this mail was good, but it wasn't" which would
> naturally be in ARF format.  This doesn't conflict at all with the
> current primary use in direct feedback loops, and it would help if the
> spec didn't appear to be abandoned.
>