[feedback-report] ARF spec oversights

[Yakov Shafranovich]

Mark Bainter wrote:
> 
> Incidentally, I DO agree with your request to require the name of the
> offended party.  I can understand some of the hesitance here, but most
> people who are going to be using this to try and be 'good' senders,
> like us, are generally sending the mail to customers at other ISPs.
> Trying to tag the fields we know for sure we'll get back historically
> only increases the chance of users filing a complaint about it.
> 
> We cannot stop sending that user email if we don't know who s/he is.
> 

We already have this feature, there is an optional header 
"Removal-Recipient" defined in section 5.3 as follows:

"
o  "Removal-Recipient:" - indicates the email address to be removed
     from the mailing list (MUST only be used with  "opt-out" and "opt-
     out-list" types).  The format of this field is defined in section
     3.4.1 of RFC 2822 [6].
"


Yakov