[feedback-report] Upcoming -02 ARF draft
Dennis Dayman
dennis at thenose.net
Mon Oct 17 09:55:32 PDT 2005
Some people have expressed concerns in terms of confusion around the naming
of the document.
They state that the word "abuse" is a report-type and because the reporting
standard reports on more than just abuse, we should change the
name to something like "Feedback-Report-Format" or something
other than a name that contains one of the report-types in it
-Dennis
> -----Original Message-----
> From: abuse-feedback-report-bounces at mipassoc.org
> [mailto:abuse-feedback-report-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf
> Of Yakov Shafranovich
> Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2005 11:48 PM
> To: abuse-feedback-report at mipassoc.org
> Subject: [feedback-report] Upcoming -02 ARF draft
>
> The existing -01 draft will expire on November 13th, 2005 and
> I have been working on the new -02 draft. I am hoping to get
> a -02pre1 version out some time in the next two weeks with
> the final draft hopefully finished before the -01 expires.
>
> First of all, I wanted to mention that the standard itself is
> not changing. I haven't seen any significant issues or
> feedback with the way it is setup now, therefore I do not
> plan on changing the actual format.
> The version number will therefore stay the same ("0.1").
>
> HOWEVER, what I do plan on doing is making the actual draft
> more readable, addressing some of the comments from the
> IETF-SMTP list and explaining how extensibility works (see my
> other list message). I also want to add an ABNF section if possible.
>
> I also would like to know whether any other changes are necessary.
>
> Yakov
>
> _______________________________________________
> abuse-feedback-report mailing list
> abuse-feedback-report at mipassoc.org
> http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/abuse-feedback-report
>
More information about the abuse-feedback-report
mailing list